James J. Read the full post.
Sep 2
2010
01:55 PM ET
Discovery gunman had history of protesting company's 'pro-birth programs'
- Comments 39
- Add comment
Latest News
- 'American Idol': Season 11 winner is...
- 'Revenge': Join Gabriel Mann live chat now
- 'Idol' Top 2: Rate the debut singles
- 'Great Gatsby' trailer's 'Zeigfeld' folly
- 'Men in Black 3': EW movie review
- 'G.I. Joe: Retaliation' pushed to 2013
- 'On the Road': EW movie review at Cannes
- 'Moonrise Kingdom': EW movie review
Look at all the loony left posts on this site supporting their fellow nut case
the people who are supporting this man. sure, over population may come to bite us in the ass in a few centuries but how would you like to be taken hostage and feared you might be shot by a LUNATIC. it makes all his credebility go away
The official position of the World Natural Health Organization in regards to global warming is that there is NO GLOBAL WARMING! Global warming is nothing more than just another hoax, just like Y2K and the global freezing claims in the 1960′s and 70′s were. Global warming is being used to generate fear and panic. Those behind this movement are using it to control people’s lives and for financial gain.
Surely he should get a Darwin Award
I agree that TLC and Discovery are no longer about “learning” or “discovery”, unless that entails having lots of unprotected sex. These programs ARE disgusting, and airtime should be promoting better causes under the banner of “The Learning Channel.” I don’t support violence or his actions, but I do support his general sentiments.
The basic law of nature: ‘If you breed like flies you must die like flies’.
Maybe, he’s not dead..they are faking his death / playing this drama to achieve their direction of stopping human birth / depopulation. 9/11 kind of a fake drama.
Too bad the uneducated, religious, and irresponsible people are the ones who have the most babies. If everyone had two children maximum, that would be sufficient. Just enough to replace yourself and your mate.
What if you die before having children or simply never having any kids, or just one? Everyone limited to two kids is an automatic equation for reducing the population, not maintaining it. Our entire society is built on the need for the next generation to be just as large or larger then the previous. If not then I hope you are not planning on every needing social security, medicade, welfare, unemployement benefits or any other social program. On second thought, I like your idea!
I think the birth rate should be cut down we are over populated, but I don’t think violence is the answer.
maybe tax the heck out of parents that have over two kids or require state/Federal funded sterilization after say two kids